Skip to main content

The New York Times

A Ledford piece reached the New York Times, in an article written by Bill Finley.

Some comments that cut to the chase:

Eric Ledford made his return to the Meadowlands on Thursday night, about 21 months after being arrested and charged with race fixing, about 21 months after the New Jersey State Police said it had “dealt a crushing blow to illegal activity in the sport of harness racing.”

How painfully ironic is that statement, huh?

Horseplayer thoughts - not news to us of course - that show how far we have to go in this business to gaining trust.

“I think all these guys are involved with that stuff,” said one of the bettors, Dom Stone.

David Philossoph, another bettor, had a different opinion.

“After what he did and what they found with his horses, I can’t believe he’s back,” he said.

As we have asked below, how hard is it for a racing commission to draft a simple rule, promote it and publicize it: If you are convicted of a crime related to racing, you are banned for life from racing.

Does anyone disagree? Will we ever get our sport back?


Anonymous said…
Doping is just such a big issue in the sport. It's to the point where I just assume if a person races top racehorses, they must be doping. How else could they compete?
Anonymous said…
i worked as a groom for a few summers when i was a kid.....back in the 80's. it was a great game...names like ....hoffman, burns, kingshott, waples, stead....the list goes on...

about 8 yrs ago, i bought a thoroughbred, and i new nothing about the game, but did know, i didnt want any part of the harness game.

handicapping....didnt didnt matter.class didnt matter,the only thing that mattered was who was first off the claim. What i saw was a sport that was so dominated by the top 5 trainers that in my opinion the rest could not win. IF i couldnt bet $20 on one of the remaining trainers. How could i buy one with them.

i find i hard to believe that cassie coleman( i dont know her ) is a better and more knowledgeable trainer than " wallace, wellwood, robinson, burgess and any other claiming trainer(that i forgot).
Although, her results are amazing.

I'm not trying to start an argument here or anything but, i think its things like this that have hindered the harness racing game for the last 15 yrs.

does anyone else remember when 8-5 was a good bet?

just my two cents
Pull the Pocket said…
Hey Guys,

Yes, this game changed.... maybe around 1990. The thoroughbred game did too, of course, but in doing some research not as much. I was putting something together for handicapping a bit ago on that (off claim and barn change stuff), so I will share it when I am done. I think it is kind of interesting.

Thanks for the comments. I always look forward to reading them.
Anonymous said…
The Meadowlands says there hands are tied .Well they better change the rules. If your going to be the leader in this sport you have to set an example.When the Ledford case came down there was so much hope.You can throw that idea in the garbage. Meadowlands take notice your off the screen and out of my pocket till you can figure out how to keep race fixers off your property.
Anonymous said…
As a passionate player of some 30 years, I could never envision not playing and betting Harness Races.

Having made several trips, over the years, to Meadowlands racetrack, specifically for betting purposes, I was very excited when common pool wagering started for that track.

Last week, however, I deleted all my database records for that track, (and I had myriads of data) and have vowed to never bet that track again, all because of the Ledford and Rucker fiasco's.

When integrity sinks to the lowest possible level, I just can't continue. Clearly its quite irrelevant what I bet or don't bet, but multiply my decision by all the others that might feel this way, and that just might be relevant.

Your blog is a most interesting blog, and in a previous post you had some recommendations to improve Woodbine racing. To me the most significant of your observations was the lack of fines/penalties for Wodbine drivers who do not close the "hole" and allow drivers who belong to the "clique" to get to the rail. Your opinion that heavy fines should be levied on such drivers is right on, and would immediately and dramatically change Woodbine racing, to a competitive level never seen before. Hope the powers that be read your blog and maybe just maybe implement the idea. Otherwise Woodbine Harness will continue to die a slow death, and deservedly so.

Popular posts from this blog

Sword Dancer Shenanigans Proves the Public's Point

Ask any random person who has not watched a horse race, or maybe have seen one or three : "Is horse racing fixed?"

They'll probably say, sure it is; common knowledge.

At that point, racing folks get excited to defend their sport. 99% of the races are clean, there is too much money involved to fix races, etc etc. 

Then we have yesterday's Sword Dancer, where not one of us can blame anyone for thinking like they do about the sport.

It's probably bad enough that a "rabbit" was entered for an old-time form of race fixing, but that the horse was ridden like a quarterhorse made the optics look terrible. That another horse - Roman Approval - had to be physically restrained due to the cowboy style race riding of the horse sent to destroy him, is probably just as bad optically.

But that was just the beginning. The real story had just begun.

At the head of the lane, this rank, spent, heart-ripped out rabbit, needed to do even more work for the 1-9 shot. He had t…

If #harnessracing is Afraid of the Answer......

There's a saying, apparently, from the legal community - never ask a question if you don't know the answer.

Today at the USTA meeting Jason Settlemoir put forth a motion that the USTA ask its membership the feelings on a question regarding slots and marketing. In a nutshell, it asked if a percentage of slot money should go into a slush fund to be spent on marketing and ancillary items to promote and grow the sport.

When the 54 director votes were tallied, the score was 47 to 7..... against.

Yes, the leadership of an organization voted down, in a landslide, asking the grassroots membership a question. 

Sure this seems super-silly, but why they did it, I think, is an easy one. They knew that if they asked the question the answer would be a resounding "yes". Then all hell would break loose. They'd have to try and get that done.

If harness racing is afraid of the answers to questions, they don't ask them. That seems to be the mantra of the sport. And it's p…

PTP's Bathing Index ® Derby Handicapping Angles - This is Much Better than Dosage

Good day racing fans!

It's one week until the Derby, where drunk people, rich people, sororities at almost every University, and others get together to watch, wager, take molly, drink juleps, wear hats, have parking issues, and partake in the annual Kentucky horse racing tradition.

I have scanned the big websites, read almost all social media and was very surprised that there are not a lot of people giving their thoughts on this year's Run for the Roses. It's like no one has an opinion! So in my never ending search for traffic, I decided to pop up a handicapping post. I think this post will help both new fans and old salty handicappers land on a winner.

As most know, physicality is important for handicapping (Leadbetter, et al). A lesser known angle is watching how a horse reacts while getting soapy water thrown on him. As long time handicapper Jessica notes, it can be a key to unlocking Derby betting fortune.


Let's begin with our control group, Kentucky Derby …