Sir Henry Cecil - the trainer of Frankel - commented this morning that his colt has been easier on himself.
"He's getting easier," the Newmarket trainer told BBC Look East. "He used to be difficult and used to pull a lot.
"He's growing and, like me, he is a late developer."
We all remember him early on being hot, sometimes uncontrollable,
seemingly unable to rate or be even the slightest bit tractable. Not now. He's seasoned to become a complete racehorse. And as we all know, there is no horse (with the possible exception of Black Caviar) with as much current buzz.
It makes me wonder. If Frankel was not allowed to 'season' and become great with a long term vision, would he have been considered arguably the top horse of all time? If they hadn't had a three year racing window as a plan early, would we be talking about him the same way today?
Who knows.
It does make me wonder a little bit more, however. What if Frankel was an American dirt horse on the Triple Crown trail instead?
He would be that same hot horse. He'd be pushed in the spring at Gulfstream and he'd probably run a couple of huge Beyers.
It's not implausible the talk would then start.
'He can't win the Derby because he can't rate.'
'He's just a miler.'
The trainer, whomever it might be, would likely race him in all the preps anyway, because it's American racing's Super Bowl/lottery ticket, where the winner can get millions upon millions in the shed.
He'd or she'd race him in the Derby, where with 20 starters and big crowds and lots of noise, unrateable hot horses usually come last, or near it.
'I told you so' would be the refrain from the handicapping class.
Arguably it would be a whole new ball of wax. Frankel would never have been allowed to season. To grow into himself. To become a great racehorse.
With the recent retirements of Ill Have Another, Hansen, Creative Cause, Algorithims, Bodemeister, and four or ten more that I am probably forgetting, it makes one wonder: What if?
What if those horses were allowed to season with a three-year plan at two instead of chasing the Crown? Would they have become great at some point?
We'll never know, I guess. But common sense says that there has been more than one great racehorse who has never been given the chance to show what he or she can do.
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
-
Welcome to the 8th edition of the Monday Super Spectacular Blog! It was Preakness week and frankly instead of a horse racing pool, next yea...
-
I continue to be fascinated with both the press and general football fan reaction to the Bill Belichick 4th down decision in Sunday's ga...
-
Last week's inaugural Super Spectacular Monday Blog got a lot of hits, and not just from Russian bots (although cпасибо to all Russian r...
-
On the Harness Edge this morning, I see that there is a story up about the BCSA offering their members up for driver and trainer interviews ...
-
We'll all remember Memorial Day '24 because of the Met Mile as the day Ray Cotolo dressed up like a hot dog. Hope @RayCotolo au...
-
Welcome to the Super Spectacular Blog Vol 5 . Thanks for reading and sharing this disorganized barrage of thoughts and links each week. Ti...
-
As most of you have heard, Charles Simon passed away yesterday at age 57 . Although a lot of you knew Chuck better than I, I still felt a s...
-
Last night's Uncle Bill twitter spaces, where TVG's Fanduel's Mike Joyce joined some raucous horseplayers was, well, kind of in...
Similar
Carryovers Provide Big Reach and an Immediate Return
Sinking marketing money directly into the horseplayer by seeding pools is effective, in both theory and practice In Ontario and elsewher...
No comments:
Post a Comment