It is being reported that the Ontario government is shopping around its lottery arm - the "OLGC" - for a potential sale to private investors. The OLGC is a partner at the reacetracks and slots program. They run the slots, the tracks and purses get their cut.
Jeff Gural, among others in racing, have long complained that the slots train might some day come to an end. Usually politics trumps everything, however. For example, there is little chance in privatizing the liquor control board because of unions, and racing and the people it employs (especially in rural ridings) also has political clout. But if the OLGC is privatized one would think that can change.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. There is a good deal of political capital behind slots at racetracks (Conservative MP's, Woodbine Entertainment to name but two) and one would have to think there will be built in protections for racetracks if this comes about. We'll see.
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
-
Auckland Reactor is coming to the US from New Zealand and he landed in the barn of the very sharp Kelvin Harrison. I don't think many w...
-
Have you seen the RCI's recent push to change the narrative on drugs and racing? The story they tell is accurate, and has been for some...
-
Yesterday on twitter there was a conversation about why some people are withholding money from Keeneland this meet. A simple question, with...
-
Elmer Patzer walked up to a betting machine and started popping in tickets to see if he won. All of a sudden, whamo, he cashed for $6.5 mill...
-
Back in the early 1990's I got my first real job. I was a pretty much an office gofer for a mining consortium. One day a gentleman cam... -
Horses opening with 10k to win on them, at smaller venues lately? I have not been playing too seriously the past two days, however I did che...
-
Every time I flip on twitter someone is annoyed that NBC is tape delaying some of the events for prime time television. Columnists have join...
-
Canterbury Park - the small Minnesota track that lowered takeout last year, only to raise it this season - concluded their meet recently. Th...
-
Good morning folks. On Awful Announcing, columnist Matt Zemek tore a hide off ESPN for what he thinks is the dumbing down of tennis cover...
1 comment:
The repercussions here are enormous.
First off, I believe that the track owns the slots facilities and leases it to the OLG the way it stands now.
So if one large company buys the rights to slots operations at the tracks, I guess they would have the same type of deal. But what happens to the recent deal signed by Fort Erie, where they are getting money in lieu of slots from the government?
And what happens down the road if a similar deal is needed.
It seems the track will have more clout when it comes to future slots deals, because they can always threaten to close down and sell the place.
However, it could be very dangerous for tracks having two competitive business going more than today. As we know, if someone loses $100 at the track, that person churned around $500 on average and the track and horsemen wind up with around $45 each from the $100 lost.
That same person who loses $100 on slots, means $1000 was churned on average. The track gets around $10 and the horsemen get around $10.
The way it is now, the OLG doesn't get in the way so much when it comes to trying to entice slot players from becoming horse bettors, but with a profit oriented company coming into the picture, there will be total incentive by them to keep slot players away from betting the ponies.
I think it probably makes sense for the individual tracks to buy the rights to the slots, instead of a large corporation taking over the whole thing.
Post a Comment