Have you seen the RCI's recent push to change the narrative on drugs and racing? The story they tell is accurate, and has been for some time. However, it is super-difficult to change a narrative, when the public believes a different one that has been passed down, generation to generation. Find me a movie about a racetrack, and I am pretty sure the storyline will include a drugged horse.
Conversely, if you ask the general public if baseball players "were all juicers" ten or twelve years ago, or even today for that matter, the answer would probably be no, despite the headlines. Ted Williams, Willie Mays and Hank Aaron were on cereal boxes, and baseball was lily-white. That was the narrative. Today, after steroid scandals in that sport, people believe the testing is good, they are on top of it, and players are playing clean. It's something the general public wants to believe about their beloved sport. So believe they do.
Yes, 0.015% of tests come back bad in racing, whereas back in 2005 for these sports:
WADA-accredited laboratories reported 482 positive samples for cyclists
in 2005. Baseball was second with 390 positives, while soccer was third
with 343. Track and field - the most tested sport - was fourth with 342.
Cycling
also had the highest percentage of positive tests, with 3.78 per cent
out of 12,751 samples, followed by baseball (3.69 per cent out of
10,580) and boxing (3.41 per cent of 2,433) and triathlon (3.41 per cent
of 2,170). Track and field had 1.67 per cent positives out of 20,464
samples.
Recently, with several high profile riders getting nabbed for blood doping (or eating bad meat according to some), cycling's perception is probably approaching racings. They have some work to do.
What should racing do to change the perception? According to marketing experts we should be doing exactly what the RCI is doing - spreading the word the best we can about testing procedures. In tandem, I think making sure new undetectable drugs, and those who use them (the real scourge, because these people win races and get more and more horses from Sgt. Schultz horse owners), are expunged from racing as soon as possible is another good angle.
One major note of caution, and people like Seth Godin have spoken about it: It can take a generation or more to change an ingrained perception. So no matter how hard we work, don't expect things to change overnight.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
-
There has been a lot of discussion of late via #simocon about racing, betting and signals and all the rest. The main theme is that racing ca...
-
Standardbred Canada has a poll up asking who is the greatest trotter who ever lived. These questions are fun, but really it is impossible t...
-
The news hit the wires today that TVG is in search of a new CEO. This news assures a shake-up in programming at the huge ADW, especially w...
-
How do we differentiate ourselves from thoroughbred bettors? What are the pros and cons of being a harness bettor? In a recent article at R2...
-
In 1996, most know that the pari-mutuel tax on wagering was reduced from 7.5% to 0.5% as part of the slots at racetracks program. The indust...
-
A lot of you have seen this Portnoy post about his beat in the Pick 6 at Del Mar yesterday: I made it to last leg of pick 6 at Del Mar. I h...
-
I saw this tweet by Nick yesterday. Nick is the morning line maker at Keeneland. I promise I’m not being a smart ass. I clearly made a horr...
-
Harness racing is a unique bird when it comes to driving styles and driving colonies. Whereas in Thoroughbred racing, a jock does not race a...
-
Sitting outside, or in the grandstand at Greenwood brings back many memories. Racing was super-popular and we usually had a packed house and...
Similar
Carryovers Provide Big Reach and an Immediate Return
Sinking marketing money directly into the horseplayer by seeding pools is effective, in both theory and practice In Ontario and elsewher...
3 comments:
Perception? How about the reality. Overall handle has been in decline the past 3 years around 1 Billion a year. Who cares what the RCI says. Try claiming a thoroughbred off some of these 30%-40% trainers. The last one I claimed was in 04. He won 3 in a row and won the day we claimed. Looked great back at the barn until a couple days started to pass. He absolutely just fell apart. I'll never forget the vets response when I asked him what he thought after a complete examination. "Where do you want me to start". It has only gotten worse since then. They can "spread the word" all they want, but I left the game a couple years ago and won't be back. At least until the 30%-40% trainers are gone.
Try rescuing or taking in from the track recently retired TB racehorses. As anonymous #1 posts - they fall apart when the drugs wear off, physically in general - and lameness? Good grief. Exactly what drugs, and are they legal - who freaking knows? I don't get these reactions from a horse coming down from a regular bute or banamine dosage, that's all I can say. I've rescued a horse coming in off a "layup" farm that was ataxic in all four legs within 36 hours and close to founder within 48, as an example. The vet is still astounded that he survived. A former Biancone horse. All I know is that I've dealt with numerous horses in withdrawal that are recent retirees from racing. They HAVE been on drugs and whether or not those drugs are illegal - talk to some honest vets out there. I've been doing that for a while by necessity.
Baseball was successful at controlling perception because they have a strong leader in their Commissioner and all teams play by the same rules.
In horseracing, there is no central authority and different rules are applied in different states/provinces. Given such, it is virtually impossible for Horseracing to affect perceptions or reality!
Post a Comment