Skip to main content

Sunny Friday!

Woodbine voice Ken Middleton has been tracking the NA Cup eligibles on the Woodbine site and it is dandy. Unlike last year there are a whole slew of horses kept eligible. We'll see what our very own Greg comes up with as he is back this year with his own tracking list. We'll hopefully start that next week here on this blog.

Hec Clouthier, all around nice fella and Prez of OHRIA, ran a marathon last week at the age of 59. I can barely run to the refrigerator. Way to go Mr. C!

The systemic failings of the pari-mutuel system (hey, it is like 150 years old!) were explored by Ray Paulick at the RCI conference last week. This is a mess that we have to clean up, no question.

There is a chat about Pick 6 betting at Paceadvantage.com going on. It is one hard to hit bet. One poster says to play them, you 'need a set'. No kidding. I have a tough enough time with pick 4's. Yesterday I play some tbred action and take a couple pick 4's: The first one at Hawthorne results in my key in leg one getting across and paying a nice $11. I hit the next two legs and I have 4 out of the 6 horses in the last leg, and they are paying between $5k and 8k. Yes, I lose. Right on cue I like one at Hollywood Park because Peter Miller's horse in the opening leg looks grand and is 13-1. I key the bomber, and he wins. I have a super ticket going; one where you think, hmmm, I might have a shot at 20k+ if I get lucky. I have three out of six horses in race 6, 5 out of 6 in race 7 and in the last leg, an all. I lose in leg two, with the 1st through third choices. It paid something like $30,000. Yep, you 'need a set' for sure to play this game.

Today California racing is meeting to discuss a takeout raise. Yes, you read that right and no you are not reading that from the Onion.com. In other news, GM is looking to increase the price of cars because they are not selling any, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are looking to raise some venture capital to start up a new sub-prime lending company.

If you are in the North East, enjoy the day - sunny and warm, yay!

Comments

Allan said…
Hey, I consider myself a fan rather than a gambler; my betting amount is miniscule compared to others who read this board. The racetracks really have no clue who their customer base is do they?

Other than boutique meets like the Delaware County Fair (home of the Little Brown Jug), their audience is not the $2 bettor; it is the 'whales'. $2 bettors are there for the fun and could care less if the takeout rate is 15%, 25% or even 30%. However the large gamblers care if the rate is 15%, 10% or whatever. They will bet where the rate is the smallest. The large time gamblers are like the people who switch banks for an extra .25% on their savings or CDs. Raise the takeout and the whales are going to a different racetrack (bank).

Why do tracks like favorites? It is because more money gets bet; you make money on the churn. Too many longshots and the money doesn't go through again. This only works if there is money to go through the windows. Have a large takeout and the initial money never makes it in.

It amazes me that these tracks don't get it. As a $2 bettor who basically goes for the fun I suggest the following. Keep your takeout rate as high as it is now (don't raise it). Rebate part of the money to the whales that belong to some type of 'club'; the amount depends on the amount bet over a month. No, the tracks don't need to eat it all on their own. And horsemen, you have an interest in this as well; some of the rebate needs to come from you. This model will work well for all bettors for the casual fan and the big bettors. It works in Atlantic City; it is called comps. The larger bettors get bigger and more frequent comps than the person who plays the quarter slots. It is not rocket science.

You know, I am currently unemployed. Maybe I should become a consultant traveling to different tracks and explaining to management and the horsemen the reality of things these days.
Cangamble said…
Allan, almost every large bettor gravitates to the best deal for them regarding rebates. Tracks and ADWs do give better deals based on how much a customer bets.
I'm totally against this though. I think today's big bettor was yesterday's $2 bettor. But whales actually make it even harder for $2 bettors to win (because whales are generally good handicappers and bettors who lose at a much lower rate than the collective house take average). By making it easier for them to increase their bets, they wind up making the takeout for the $2 bettor even higher.
$2 bettors may not be cognizant of track takeout but they do know how long their bankroll is expected to last betting horses. The faster they lose, the more they become disillusioned.
The slots industry understand this concept a lot more than the racing execs do. They know that if they up the house advantage to more than 10%, customers have a higher likelihood of not returning so quickly and maybe even giving up on the game.
The only chance for growth in horse racing is to get $2 bettors to spend more time betting. They may become bigger bettors, and the more time they spend betting and handicapping means that friends and family are likely to become exposed to horse racing as well.
My suggestion is to have equal rebates for everyone who decides to open a racing account.
The only people who should continue betting into a high takeout are those who go one or two times a year if they decide to not open a betting account.

Popular posts from this blog

Sword Dancer Shenanigans Proves the Public's Point

Ask any random person who has not watched a horse race, or maybe have seen one or three : "Is horse racing fixed?"

They'll probably say, sure it is; common knowledge.

At that point, racing folks get excited to defend their sport. 99% of the races are clean, there is too much money involved to fix races, etc etc. 

Then we have yesterday's Sword Dancer, where not one of us can blame anyone for thinking like they do about the sport.

It's probably bad enough that a "rabbit" was entered for an old-time form of race fixing, but that the horse was ridden like a quarterhorse made the optics look terrible. That another horse - Roman Approval - had to be physically restrained due to the cowboy style race riding of the horse sent to destroy him, is probably just as bad optically.

But that was just the beginning. The real story had just begun.

At the head of the lane, this rank, spent, heart-ripped out rabbit, needed to do even more work for the 1-9 shot. He had t…

If #harnessracing is Afraid of the Answer......

There's a saying, apparently, from the legal community - never ask a question if you don't know the answer.

Today at the USTA meeting Jason Settlemoir put forth a motion that the USTA ask its membership the feelings on a question regarding slots and marketing. In a nutshell, it asked if a percentage of slot money should go into a slush fund to be spent on marketing and ancillary items to promote and grow the sport.

When the 54 director votes were tallied, the score was 47 to 7..... against.

Yes, the leadership of an organization voted down, in a landslide, asking the grassroots membership a question. 

Sure this seems super-silly, but why they did it, I think, is an easy one. They knew that if they asked the question the answer would be a resounding "yes". Then all hell would break loose. They'd have to try and get that done.

If harness racing is afraid of the answers to questions, they don't ask them. That seems to be the mantra of the sport. And it's p…

PTP's Bathing Index ® Derby Handicapping Angles - This is Much Better than Dosage

Good day racing fans!

It's one week until the Derby, where drunk people, rich people, sororities at almost every University, and others get together to watch, wager, take molly, drink juleps, wear hats, have parking issues, and partake in the annual Kentucky horse racing tradition.

I have scanned the big websites, read almost all social media and was very surprised that there are not a lot of people giving their thoughts on this year's Run for the Roses. It's like no one has an opinion! So in my never ending search for traffic, I decided to pop up a handicapping post. I think this post will help both new fans and old salty handicappers land on a winner.

As most know, physicality is important for handicapping (Leadbetter, et al). A lesser known angle is watching how a horse reacts while getting soapy water thrown on him. As long time handicapper Jessica notes, it can be a key to unlocking Derby betting fortune.


Preach.

Let's begin with our control group, Kentucky Derby …