Prairie Meadows, a racino in Iowa, is being urged to end harness racing, while keeping both quarterhorse and thoroughbred racing.
Prairie Meadows is considering changing to a racing format that completely splits its Thoroughbred and Quarter Horse racing while eliminating harness racing.
I wonder if headlines like this will be a wake up call for us? I have a sneaky feeling it won't.
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
-
There has been a lot of discussion of late via #simocon about racing, betting and signals and all the rest. The main theme is that racing ca...
-
Standardbred Canada has a poll up asking who is the greatest trotter who ever lived. These questions are fun, but really it is impossible t...
-
The news hit the wires today that TVG is in search of a new CEO. This news assures a shake-up in programming at the huge ADW, especially w... -
How do we differentiate ourselves from thoroughbred bettors? What are the pros and cons of being a harness bettor? In a recent article at R2...
-
A lot of you have seen this Portnoy post about his beat in the Pick 6 at Del Mar yesterday: I made it to last leg of pick 6 at Del Mar. I h...
-
I saw this tweet by Nick yesterday. Nick is the morning line maker at Keeneland. I promise I’m not being a smart ass. I clearly made a horr...
-
Harness racing is a unique bird when it comes to driving styles and driving colonies. Whereas in Thoroughbred racing, a jock does not race a...
-
In 1996, most know that the pari-mutuel tax on wagering was reduced from 7.5% to 0.5% as part of the slots at racetracks program. The indust...
-
Sitting outside, or in the grandstand at Greenwood brings back many memories. Racing was super-popular and we usually had a packed house and...
4 comments:
They are keeping the $1 million in purse supplements for fair races at least. Prairie Meadows is my home track, and the mixed meet format they has frankly always been a bit of a mess so something had to change.
Harness racing has consistently had lower handle and lower attendance than either the thoroughbred or the mixed quarter horse meets. You also have to consider the cost to scraping the track to prepare it for harness racing (I seem to remember reading this was in the area of $500,000). Combine those factors with the fact that much of the general public here feels like horse racing is a waste of money and should be dropped completely at Prairie Meadows and cutting one of the bigger money losers probably seemed like the obvious choice.
I personally don't have anything against harness racing, but I'm not sure what sort of wake up call there might be here for you. Probably not one harness interests want to hear.
It's just matter of time until we see more of this on a much larger and violent scale.
It might go like this....Casino at racetrack subsidizing racing to the tune of $100 million a year goes to state government and says...racing is dead and just drains all of this money from us...we are both (casino and gov)hurting for cash...why don't we just whack up the $100 million and get rid of this parasite....DONE DEAL
What ITP said is basically what is happening in Iowa. A study came out last year saying that racing is losing money at to the tune of ~$30 million a year, and to say that it created an uproar is putting it mildly. If it was not mandated as part of the casino license that the track have racing it might be more than just harness racing being cut.
ITP is correct. They had an investor conference yesterday regarding the casino industry in Atlantic City and the first thing attacked by analysts is the lunacy of subsidizing racetracks where no one attends. Slot money is a crutch and unless we get people interested in the sport; and that also means in the grandstands, people are going to question why to support racing with slot revenue when it can go to the state.
Post a Comment