In racing one of the biggest debates is about racedates. Horse owners or trainers (like I am sometime) want a lot of them. Please dial me up a five horse field where we all get some dough! Oh, and make the purse high too, ok?
Bettors on the other hand like short fields about as much as gastro-intestinal surgery.
Who is right, who is wrong? I guess that depends on your perspective. In the case of handle as a metric, deeper fields, less races and more contentious affairs win that battle ten out of ten times.
In thoroughbred racing, Delaware Park concluded their meet with something wacky - a rise in handles.
Delaware Park raced 27 fewer days this year but registered increases in total handle and average daily handle, track officials said Oct. 28. Track officials and horsemen agreed to cut the final seven days of the meet to conserve purse money. This year’s meet originally was scheduled to end Nov. 7.
Larger field size, a positively correlated metric to handle (add one horse a race and handle goes up by 5%), is the main reason why they say.
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
-
Welcome to the 8th edition of the Monday Super Spectacular Blog! It was Preakness week and frankly instead of a horse racing pool, next yea... -
I continue to be fascinated with both the press and general football fan reaction to the Bill Belichick 4th down decision in Sunday's ga...
-
Last week's inaugural Super Spectacular Monday Blog got a lot of hits, and not just from Russian bots (although cпасибо to all Russian r... -
Welcome to the Super Spectacular Blog Vol 5 . Thanks for reading and sharing this disorganized barrage of thoughts and links each week. Ti... -
This past weekend's racing proves to me that this game, although, yes, with less public money, with the teams, with the sharps (which no... -
On the Harness Edge this morning, I see that there is a story up about the BCSA offering their members up for driver and trainer interviews ...
-
Last night's Uncle Bill twitter spaces, where TVG's Fanduel's Mike Joyce joined some raucous horseplayers was, well, kind of in...
-
I was outside awhile back and noticed some kids playing with the pigskin. They flipped me the ball and I sent one kid on a fly pattern. I ga...
4 comments:
Lots of cheap racing at Del Park this year but decent size fields across the board. It's a no brainer -- bigger fields increases handle no matter what the class of horses.
Rocket science it ain't. Race every day with small fields and nobody cares. Give bettors a breather and see better contests, and maybe even some better horses slightly more often, people will show their support with cash.
Flash poll via Paceadvantage.com:
Which would you rather play.....
High quality horses in races with short fields : 9.6%
Low quality horses in races with full fields: 90.4%
Yet the industry (see Southern California racing) clings to the welfare model of 5 or 6 horses and money for everyone. It would be ok if that is what they want to do.... just don't complain when your handle gets torched.
Peter B
Maybe the only way to motivate racing to improve their product and increase handle is to tie the slots money to the handle. Keep your handle up and you get all the slots money. If the handle drops then some of the slots money reverts to the government.
RG
Post a Comment