"Jocks (or drivers) that stay around for a late mount mean the horse is a good bet"
Horseplayer
Below we spoke about statistics and how they can be backfitted, and/or used improperly. The use of databases are a relatively new thing, because computers are super-fast now, and more and more people are using commercial database software. I remember as a kid hearing the above quote almost each race day. If someone stuck around, or showed up with only two drives, one of them late in the card, that last one was like printing money.
Dan on the HTR Software board ran those numbers for the runners. I would suspect a lot of money was burned on this angle throughout the years. Databases can be Mythbusters.
In a nutshell:
Win percentage for all the top riders chosen: 18%
Win percentage last race of the day (top riders): 17%
Win percentage last ride of the day (they 'stuck around'): 18%
Impact value for benchmark: 1.49
Impact value for "stick around races": 1.49
It is hard to find a deviation on impact values for any stat that is zippo. To have them equal is astounding. Sticking around for a late mount is correlated to winning about as much as what they had for lunch that day is.
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
-
Auckland Reactor is coming to the US from New Zealand and he landed in the barn of the very sharp Kelvin Harrison. I don't think many w...
-
Have you seen the RCI's recent push to change the narrative on drugs and racing? The story they tell is accurate, and has been for some...
-
Elmer Patzer walked up to a betting machine and started popping in tickets to see if he won. All of a sudden, whamo, he cashed for $6.5 mill...
-
Yesterday on twitter there was a conversation about why some people are withholding money from Keeneland this meet. A simple question, with...
-
Back in the early 1990's I got my first real job. I was a pretty much an office gofer for a mining consortium. One day a gentleman cam... -
Horses opening with 10k to win on them, at smaller venues lately? I have not been playing too seriously the past two days, however I did che...
-
Every time I flip on twitter someone is annoyed that NBC is tape delaying some of the events for prime time television. Columnists have join...
-
Canterbury Park - the small Minnesota track that lowered takeout last year, only to raise it this season - concluded their meet recently. Th...
-
Good morning folks. On Awful Announcing, columnist Matt Zemek tore a hide off ESPN for what he thinks is the dumbing down of tennis cover...
5 comments:
I've always given some validity to that angle, but like any other angle, I think you have to pick and choose your spots. I agree, just because one of the regular drivers or jocks has a horse in the last doesn't usually mean anything. But there are certain situations in which I do think it's something to check out. A cheap claimer in the last race after a G1 stakes; a ride for a trainer he/she doesn't usually work for, or, best of all, a top guy who came in from out of town to ride a particular stakes horse.
The bottom line is, there needs to be a valid logic behind an angle before it even having a chance of being profitable.
I just don't see that logic here. Drivers who are already at the track will always stick around for another drive no matter what the horse is like (unless they are headed for another track i.e. flammy to woodbine). Usually drivers will be driving a fair distance to the track, and they won't be too inclined to go home just because they arn't listed in the 7th or 8th race.
This is their job. They all want to be #1 and will take a mount where they can get it. I guess Trevor is an exception to this.
Basically you are betting the angle that a good break to relax and play some cards in the drivers room will help that driver win the next time he gets in the sulky?
Once upon a time the last race at CD right after the Derby was always a mile and a sixteenth for the absolute bottom claimers. This went on for years and ended in 1972 after a horse by the name of Postal Milargo shipped in from Hazel Park. His last 3 races had been pretty bad and he was quoted at 20-1 with an apprentice up. Then as the horses were ready to go onto the track his regular jockey from Hazel Park gets announced as the rider. Postal Milargo breaks on top,is never threatened and pays $6.00. Something like 60-70% of the win money on him went through a couple of $50 & $100 windows in close proximity of each other. When the Ky Racing Commission had there hearings they asked the jockey why he showed up at CD and with a straight face he told them he thought he might be able to pick up a Derby mount. I do not think Postal Milargo ever ran again and CD made it their policy that there would never again be races for bottom feeders on Derby Day.
So maybe a jock traveling a few hundred miles for the last race might be something to watch for.
RG
RG answers Alan's point with some empirical data :)
Wow, this is why I am glad I have a blog. What a great story RG.
I think the stat is valid mainly because no one knows which race will be carded in the first race, last race, etc. until the after mounts are accepted.
I don't think stewards would allow jocks to take off mounts very frequently on the basis that they have to wait around for a horse that probably won't win.
Post a Comment