As most know by now, the $891,000 pick 6 jackpot was hit last week at Santa Anita, but as the DRF reports, it was not without controversy.
The controversy arose a half-hour before the race when Horse
Identifier Jennifer Paige discovered Fly to Mars was a gelding, even
though he was listed as a colt in the track program and past
Paige immediately phoned the stewards, who said they were alerted as
the horses were loading the gate for race 10. Stewards quickly
investigated and learned the Peter Miller-trained Fly to Mars had in
fact been gelded since his most recent start in June 2016.
He was a “first-time gelding,” a piece of information that most
bettors consider to be a potentially significant handicapping factor.
The problem Saturday is that no one knew Fly to Mars was a “first-time G” until after race 10 had been run.
At the present time there are insiders, horseplayers and others calling for changes to the "first time gelding" reporting rules, because the current rules clearly aren't working.
The problem with that is, we've all been through this before.
Back in 2011, "At Hollywood Park, a horse who was only reported gelded 30
minutes before post time (giving no chance for horizontal handicappers
to change their tickets, or use the information) won, paying $56."
Changes asked for, by horseplayer advocates and others, were that fines be imposed and the horse be scratched. The logic behind such calls was sound, because if a horse is scratched, it's a strong incentive to make sure every horse's papers are in order. - no trainer who got a horse ready, pre-raced him, has owners in the stands, etc, wants to scratch a horse. When you add a fine, it's adds to the deterrent. This problem would likely be fixed forever, with strong deterrents, and strong leadership.
That didn't happen. Fast forwarding seven years, the same problem rears its ugly head in a very public way.
This is why so many horseplayers throw their hands up and leave. It's why so many give up the fight to change the sport for the better. No matter what case you have, what evidence you have; no matter if everyone with a lick of common sense agrees with a simple change like this, nothing tends to happen. Then, in seven years, or seven months, or seven days, you're right back to square one.
Being a customer advocate or customer of this sport is a war of attrition. And attrition keeps winning.
Sinking marketing money directly into the horseplayer by seeding pools is effective, in both theory and practice In Ontario and elsewher...
One of life's many mysteries on gambling twitter is the Jackpot Bet. Oftentimes people like @shottakingtime, echoed by others, will pos...
Yesterday we wrote about some (many?) inside the business who don't quite understand what we bettors do each day to try and scratch som...
There's something going on in horse racing today , but I have not really followed it. Instead, I've been thinking about two words we...
Innovation and horse racing. Put together, the two of them elicit feverish reaction in this sport. One one side you have the customers, alon...
Unless you are off the twitter grid (God bless you), you've no doubt witnessed the feud of the month(s) between ITP and some public raci...