It is being reported that the Ontario government is shopping around its lottery arm - the "OLGC" - for a potential sale to private investors. The OLGC is a partner at the reacetracks and slots program. They run the slots, the tracks and purses get their cut.
Jeff Gural, among others in racing, have long complained that the slots train might some day come to an end. Usually politics trumps everything, however. For example, there is little chance in privatizing the liquor control board because of unions, and racing and the people it employs (especially in rural ridings) also has political clout. But if the OLGC is privatized one would think that can change.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. There is a good deal of political capital behind slots at racetracks (Conservative MP's, Woodbine Entertainment to name but two) and one would have to think there will be built in protections for racetracks if this comes about. We'll see.
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
-
Standardbred Canada has a poll up asking who is the greatest trotter who ever lived. These questions are fun, but really it is impossible t...
-
There has been a lot of discussion of late via #simocon about racing, betting and signals and all the rest. The main theme is that racing ca...
-
The news hit the wires today that TVG is in search of a new CEO. This news assures a shake-up in programming at the huge ADW, especially w... -
How do we differentiate ourselves from thoroughbred bettors? What are the pros and cons of being a harness bettor? In a recent article at R2...
-
A lot of you have seen this Portnoy post about his beat in the Pick 6 at Del Mar yesterday: I made it to last leg of pick 6 at Del Mar. I h...
-
In 1996, most know that the pari-mutuel tax on wagering was reduced from 7.5% to 0.5% as part of the slots at racetracks program. The indust...
-
I saw this tweet by Nick yesterday. Nick is the morning line maker at Keeneland. I promise I’m not being a smart ass. I clearly made a horr...
-
Harness racing is a unique bird when it comes to driving styles and driving colonies. Whereas in Thoroughbred racing, a jock does not race a...
-
Sitting outside, or in the grandstand at Greenwood brings back many memories. Racing was super-popular and we usually had a packed house and...
1 comment:
The repercussions here are enormous.
First off, I believe that the track owns the slots facilities and leases it to the OLG the way it stands now.
So if one large company buys the rights to slots operations at the tracks, I guess they would have the same type of deal. But what happens to the recent deal signed by Fort Erie, where they are getting money in lieu of slots from the government?
And what happens down the road if a similar deal is needed.
It seems the track will have more clout when it comes to future slots deals, because they can always threaten to close down and sell the place.
However, it could be very dangerous for tracks having two competitive business going more than today. As we know, if someone loses $100 at the track, that person churned around $500 on average and the track and horsemen wind up with around $45 each from the $100 lost.
That same person who loses $100 on slots, means $1000 was churned on average. The track gets around $10 and the horsemen get around $10.
The way it is now, the OLG doesn't get in the way so much when it comes to trying to entice slot players from becoming horse bettors, but with a profit oriented company coming into the picture, there will be total incentive by them to keep slot players away from betting the ponies.
I think it probably makes sense for the individual tracks to buy the rights to the slots, instead of a large corporation taking over the whole thing.
Post a Comment