Ah, my beloved hockey.
The "white out" is one of the best
things you'll ever see at a big NHL tilt. For those who have not heard the
term, it’s where upwards of 20,000 fans all come to the game dressed in home
whites. It makes our TV screens look like a snowstorm. Home whites are like
apple pie, an old blanket, a comfortable pillow; home whites and snowstorms for
a winter sport like hockey was positive branding. Then one day that all
2003, home darks were mandated. Why? You see, the NHL saw everyone in each
city buying home whites, but home darks were not sold hardly at all. By
mandating this change, it made people buy more jerseys. The white out is gone and unless the NHL rethinks this (there are petitions by fans out there), it will never return.
Most recently, we’ve seen Wall Street meet
main street again in hockey. This time the NHL is moving
towards advertising corporations on World Cup uniforms. The NHL, with its
traditions, long history, and antifragile nature as a sports business entity
has been monetized like never before. It's about squeezing a lemon, with most
everything else an afterthought.
The NHL has increased revenues the last
twenty years, but it's not like the league is super-healthy. The top teams, in
big cities, make the bulk of the money, while the southern US and small market
teams bring in roughly a quarter of those revenues. Sports leagues are built on
parity, and in the NHL that suffers.
In the NFL it is starting to look similar,
but it seems there is pushback because the league's vision is paramount. Past
commissioners - Rozelle and Tagliabue - were more about growth via principle,
long term vision, and catering to what the fans expect and desire. Recently,
Commisioner Goodell has been leaning different. In the early part of the
century, the first down line was sold to Fed Ex for international broadcasts,
and ads on jerseys were broached. Goodell, according to one owner quoted in America's
Game, A History of the NFL said with distaste, "he uses the terms
monetize and commoditize."
It got so heated that in one league meeting,
Pittsburgh Steelers owner Dan Rooney sent Goodell a mock up of an NASCAR
looking NFL jersey with a note that said, "This is what we're trying to
avoid." Fortunately, there are still some people concerned about long term
branding over a few dollars in that sport.
As we’ve seen the last fifteen or so years, everyone
seems hell-bent on monetizing everything. Beating a $2.01 EPS has taken a front
seat to long term growth. In some firms, if you can cut ten people for cost
savings of $450k, but get others to do most of the work where productivity only
goes down by $400k, it's a done deal. It's kind of the way things are
In horse racing, another one of my beloved
sports, similar seems to be happening. It’s been going on for a long time and I
would argue, the sport is worse off, not better off for it.
Last year near this time, the big news was
the Kentucky Derby. Owners were upset about ticket availability, parking
spaces, and seemingly everything under the sun. In early April, there was a
takeout hike at the track that even a blind man could see it was about making
more money for two days, and little to do with business the other 363. What
we've been seeing is a corporation, needing to meet Wall Street expectations,
monetizing every inch of space, and every customer, to try and do just that. It’s
all about a bigger share of revenue.
Meanwhile, racing’s other big entity, the
Stronach Group is fighting with Mid-Atlantic tracks about revenue splits. It’s
about “monetizing a signal” better and getting a bigger share of it.
In California, there was the big fight
regarding SB1072, the takeout hike act. A bigger share of revenue from
customers and racetracks was fought for.
Can anyone tell me how a Churchill Downs Inc EBITDA
increase from an event in May grows the horse racing pie?
Can anyone tell me how Magna getting 4% more
from a signal, while another racetrack gets 4% less grows a pie?
Can anyone tell me how the TOC getting a
bigger slice for a purse, while tracks who put on the races and customers who
supply the purse money get less, grows a pie?
Horse racing will grow a pie not by
monetizing everything, but by looking at the big picture with some sort of
Slot money need not be monetized via a purse
only. Have you noticed great betting races, more owners, and better racing at
Aqueduct since slot cash was added? That money needs to be spent to cultivate
ownership and increase wagering as its first and foremost metric.
Betting money needs not to be monetized by
getting a bigger share for an entity, but by cultivating customers to bet more
money, and encouraging them to become long term customers.
Corporations will always monetize racing, and
that’s the way it is. Not a heck of a lot can be done about it, but for pete’s
sake, if you are writing a slots deal with a casino company at the other end of
the table, ensure checks and balances are in place that are pro-growth for
horse racing. The way slot deals have been written in North America, have been
completely devoid of vision.
A lot of people look at the horse racing
industry as a glass half empty. I tend to disagree. The sport has been run (as
an entity) with so little vision, with so little thought to the future, that if
it’s ever corrected, it can’t help but grow. The first step is changing the culture to think less about monetizing one revenue stream for today, and about how multiple revenue streams can be achieved for tomorrow.
Sinking marketing money directly into the horseplayer by seeding pools is effective, in both theory and practice In Ontario and elsewher...
One of life's many mysteries on gambling twitter is the Jackpot Bet. Oftentimes people like @shottakingtime, echoed by others, will pos...
Yesterday we wrote about some (many?) inside the business who don't quite understand what we bettors do each day to try and scratch som...
There's something going on in horse racing today , but I have not really followed it. Instead, I've been thinking about two words we...
Innovation and horse racing. Put together, the two of them elicit feverish reaction in this sport. One one side you have the customers, alon...
Unless you are off the twitter grid (God bless you), you've no doubt witnessed the feud of the month(s) between ITP and some public raci...