Friday is guest poster day, but an update from me which you may find of interest.
A poster below commenting on my slots story talked about Vernon and Tioga being a tax issue. He is correct. My post last night may have came across as blaming Gural and the SBOA for these problems. That is not the case of course, my post was a broad one related to the business not having a proper business plan for the subsidy and not doing enough with it, and what we are seeing is many horseman and tracks (or in the Toronto case the city) wanting bigger slices, or because of lack of a centralized funding and revenue structure: fighting for tax rates.
If we hired Michelangelo to do a harness racing sculpture with slots money, we would not have anyone to tell him what we wanted sculpted and he would come in each day to find that four or five special interests came overnight into his studio armed with chisels. His masterpiece would be turned into nothing but clay chips, strewn across the floor.
Today, Jeff Gural speaks about the state of the game, the problems with Racino's, the industry and much more in a podcast on the Harness Edge. The Edge tease says "he pulls no punches". He is open and honest, and he directly states that VLT and slots revenue was passed to help racing, to give it "one more chance". He feels, like most of us, that we are blowing it. He goes on to say what he thinks will happen in the future if we don't get our act together, namely that some state will have a cash crunch and ask why we are giving money to a dying industry while firing teachers. It is something we say here on the blog: "We have to be able to stand on our own four hooves".
Anyway, the interview is here. It is 15 minutes, and it is 15 minutes that is an amazing look at the fingers in the pie racing economics, infighting, revenue models and all the short-term thinking that has plagued us for so long.
After listening, I think Jeff agrees wholeheartedly with my last paragraph in the piece in question. I think he would agree that after tax cash filtered as X% to the track, X% to horseman and X% to a central organization for North American harness racing would be a model everyone should get behind. Tracks have to be able to make money, horse owners have to race for decent purses, and lord knows we need a central organization that is funded by racino revenue to grow our fan base. This organization would of course lobby for uniform tax rules, so Vernon's problems would never have surfaced in the first place.
Getting there, with the mess the game is in, is the hard part.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
-
There has been a lot of discussion of late via #simocon about racing, betting and signals and all the rest. The main theme is that racing ca...
-
Standardbred Canada has a poll up asking who is the greatest trotter who ever lived. These questions are fun, but really it is impossible t...
-
The news hit the wires today that TVG is in search of a new CEO. This news assures a shake-up in programming at the huge ADW, especially w...
-
How do we differentiate ourselves from thoroughbred bettors? What are the pros and cons of being a harness bettor? In a recent article at R2...
-
I saw this tweet by Nick yesterday. Nick is the morning line maker at Keeneland. I promise I’m not being a smart ass. I clearly made a horr...
-
Harness racing is a unique bird when it comes to driving styles and driving colonies. Whereas in Thoroughbred racing, a jock does not race a...
-
In 1996, most know that the pari-mutuel tax on wagering was reduced from 7.5% to 0.5% as part of the slots at racetracks program. The indust...
-
Sitting outside, or in the grandstand at Greenwood brings back many memories. Racing was super-popular and we usually had a packed house and...
-
I had a look at the US Open results tonight to see Tiger Woods - on a bum knee - manage two eagles en route to the lead in the years second ...
Similar
Carryovers Provide Big Reach and an Immediate Return
Sinking marketing money directly into the horseplayer by seeding pools is effective, in both theory and practice In Ontario and elsewher...
No comments:
Post a Comment