Jeff Gural, Chairman of American Racing and owner of Vernon Downs and Toiga Downs in New York, has decided to close up shop.
He will shut down the tracks after an Assembly panel this week rejected a plan to increase revenue to the ailing harness tracks.
"I should have closed long ago," Gural said. He has said the tracks lose about $1 million a month.
Low handles and decreases in slot/vlt revenue are the culprit.
In other news, New Jersey is apparently getting their band-aid this week, maybe next.
The SBOA of New Jersey announced in a release this afternoon that an agreement to supplement purse money for the racetracks in New Jersey is close to completion.
"We've been told by a high ranking Corzine Administration official that they are very close to finalizing a supplement agreement,"
I can not get fired up about these things and toe the company line. I just can’t. For goodness sakes it appears we are not only looking for a subsidy in racing, we are now looking to subsidize slots. We are soon to be subsidizing subsidies!
Let me be clear, I do not harbour ill-will or dislike what Gural or the SBOA are doing. If I was in their position I would do the same thing. It’s not their fault, it is the business’ fault for not looking toward the future.
I could get behind a subsidy, if and only if I heard something like this from all parties looking for one: “We need this subsidy because we need to improve our product and its distribution. With the proceeds we are going to create a new betting platform and export it all over the World, we are going to study how we can get our product on betfair and with European bookmakers to expand our markets, we are going to have a competitive rewards system so our customers will benefit and tell friends, we are going to use this money to market and brand and better our product, we are going to spend money finding out what customers want and what we can do about improving harness racing, and with this money we will make harness racing a force for the 21st century and beyond.”
I simply can not support the status quo. It’s more of the same and it clearly has not worked. "If at first you don't succeed, do the same thing over again" is not a policy, it is a delusion.
Note: I have a new post on this issue up, "Gural on the Edge", with reference to his interview at The Harness Edge, which is posted on their website.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
-
There has been a lot of discussion of late via #simocon about racing, betting and signals and all the rest. The main theme is that racing ca...
-
Standardbred Canada has a poll up asking who is the greatest trotter who ever lived. These questions are fun, but really it is impossible t...
-
The news hit the wires today that TVG is in search of a new CEO. This news assures a shake-up in programming at the huge ADW, especially w...
-
How do we differentiate ourselves from thoroughbred bettors? What are the pros and cons of being a harness bettor? In a recent article at R2...
-
Auckland Reactor is coming to the US from New Zealand and he landed in the barn of the very sharp Kelvin Harrison. I don't think many w...
-
Have you seen the RCI's recent push to change the narrative on drugs and racing? The story they tell is accurate, and has been for some...
-
Back in the early 1990's I got my first real job. I was a pretty much an office gofer for a mining consortium. One day a gentleman cam...
-
Horses opening with 10k to win on them, at smaller venues lately? I have not been playing too seriously the past two days, however I did che...
-
Yesterday on twitter there was a conversation about why some people are withholding money from Keeneland this meet. A simple question, with...
Similar
Carryovers Provide Big Reach and an Immediate Return
Sinking marketing money directly into the horseplayer by seeding pools is effective, in both theory and practice In Ontario and elsewher...
2 comments:
I disagree.
Tioga Downs is not looking for a subsidy; they want the NY tax rate to reflect their cost of doing business.
Today they are taxed beyond their (reasonable) expenses.
Apparently, the NY Legislature would rather have 100% of nothing than X% of something.
Hi TD,
Don't get me wrong, I know the semantics of, as Gural puts it "lottery economics" are prohibitive to him there. My post is more broad in nature. That is, if we had more racing fans rather than gaming fans we might not be having these problems. Since we put so much money into purses and that has not made new fans, it seems like (broadly) the overall direction and policy is flawed.
I just can't see a tax break, or a bigger slice of the pie making things better for the overall game. For Vernon yes, for the game, no.
Anyhow, I am going to follow up the post in a bit. I am just listening to the Gural interview on the harness edge podcast. He has some interesting things to say.
Post a Comment