The Guardian takes a big swipe today at the International Tennis Federation in a story, "How a Culture of Secrecy Aids Corruption"
"Tennis authorities can have no excuses for an opaque process that only serves to protect the sport's image rather than its integrity"
Further, "The idea that investigations should be conducted in the dark, shrouded
in secrecy and accompanied by an air of paranoia and unease, can only
add to the impression that the ITF is more concerned about the image of
the sport than being seen to root out corruption without fear or favour."
This is a systemic strategy we've seen in horse racing from time to time. "Accentuate the positive", "nothing to see here, move along", the Sgt. Shultz method. It hasn't worked, and it won't work. It can never work; for three main reasons.
i) internal investigations, not releasing negative news, or spinning it in a positive, Pravda way, allows bad decisions to be unaccountable. Unaccountable decisions that are poor, are never corrected, inhibits the sport from moving forward.
ii) The easiest folks to get back into the sport are those who once owned or bet, and left because of such issues. There's money on the table and the sport doesn't look to grab this low hanging fruit, they step on it.
iii) in an internet age, customers (horse owners, bettors) are more educated than ever before, and when they see "foot dragging" they pushback themselves, and this is unhealthy. As the Guardian notes: "Fans have gone from feeling uneasy about those who run their sports to outright hostility and scepticism."
Jeff Gural, someone who is trying to change the culture, shows just how tough this is. In the DRF yesterday, he was responding to a criticism of his tactics to ban people with bad tests from his racetracks (in this case EPO) that he catches.
"Just so you know, no race track owner in the area or Commission
member has ever contacted me to ask why someone is not allowed to race
at our racetracks. You probably saw the press release from Yonkers
extolling the virtues of Rene Allard, who is the leading trainer and who
is someone we caught drugging horses multiple times. The reality is no
one really cares."
No one cares, or are we just "accentuating the positive?" A strong case can be made they're synonymous.
Horse racing needs sound decision making, it needs to address why bettors and horse owners have left the game and get some of them back; it needs to change the way people think about racing. This is not done in the shadows, following some sophomoric Baghdad Bob public relations playbook. Wishing Jeff Gural would shut the hell up won't help. It's done with leadership, sound ethics and a respect for those who patronize both the horse sales and betting windows. That will take a culture change, just like the one tennis is going through.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
-
Standardbred Canada has a poll up asking who is the greatest trotter who ever lived. These questions are fun, but really it is impossible t...
-
There has been a lot of discussion of late via #simocon about racing, betting and signals and all the rest. The main theme is that racing ca...
-
The news hit the wires today that TVG is in search of a new CEO. This news assures a shake-up in programming at the huge ADW, especially w...
-
How do we differentiate ourselves from thoroughbred bettors? What are the pros and cons of being a harness bettor? In a recent article at R2...
-
Auckland Reactor is coming to the US from New Zealand and he landed in the barn of the very sharp Kelvin Harrison. I don't think many w...
-
Have you seen the RCI's recent push to change the narrative on drugs and racing? The story they tell is accurate, and has been for some...
-
Back in the early 1990's I got my first real job. I was a pretty much an office gofer for a mining consortium. One day a gentleman cam...
-
Horses opening with 10k to win on them, at smaller venues lately? I have not been playing too seriously the past two days, however I did che...
-
Yesterday on twitter there was a conversation about why some people are withholding money from Keeneland this meet. A simple question, with...
Similar
Carryovers Provide Big Reach and an Immediate Return
Sinking marketing money directly into the horseplayer by seeding pools is effective, in both theory and practice In Ontario and elsewher...
1 comment:
Jeff Gural has been quoted several timesm about how other tracks and state racing regulators have never contacted him to ask about people he's barred. Are track managers embarrassed by Gural's "get rid of the bad apples" philosophy? Do they just not care as long as they get a paycheck?
It's about time the racing media asks those questions. Let fans and bettors read why horsemen and horsewomen not allowed at the Meadowlands, or with histories of cheating, find tracks that welcome them. I've asked why drug cheaters and others with a long list of rules violations are permitted at the track near me. The person in charge answered,"They're licensed by the racing commission." Took no responsibility.
Post a Comment