Triple Crown time usually brings story time. Often times it's about a trainers past, or an owner. Sometimes it's about the horse. A lot of times it's a whole lot of nothing. This time, a narrative is surfacing that I feel is actually a pretty important conversation to have. It's about the history of the game and what makes a great horse.
Today in the Beachwood Reporter, (h/t to Crunk on twitter) Tom Chambers cuts to the chase.
"The once-defeated colt's future has already been romance-arranged with
the sale of his breeding rights to Coolmore Ashford Stud in Versailles,
Kentucky. Check your emotional investment at the door. Resist the hype run-up to the June 6 Test of Champions. When his connections announce a minor injury and retire him "for the
good of the horse," you'll be left disappointed, at the very least,
The background to such an opinion is not new. It goes a little something like this.
In general terms (I have no idea what the AP deal is): The horse is worth $20 million, and already bought and paid for at that price. If he wins a Triple Crown, the price goes up, everyone makes a little more money as he is syndicated for more. If he races in the fall, races poorly, or gets exposed as not as good as advertised, it costs investors money. So, it's best to call it a day.
The above is the exact reason there was so much breeder and big horse buyer (flipper?) disdain for the Gural Rule in harness racing, where horses had to race at four, then be retired. Virtually 98% of the industry loved the rule, the minority who did business like this hated it. The result? The 2% won and the rule was changed.
This is much more than just 'it's my horse I can do what I want with it' arguments. It's about the history of the game and the game itself.
Winning a Triple Crown comes with immediate accolades. "Best horse ever", "great horse", "coulda hung with Big Red I bet". Those are cash register memes. As Tom Chambers points out, these narratives can survive the test of time in some quarters with immediate retirement, when no one has the slightest idea if they're true. It's impossible to prove the unprovable.
Chambers: "If he wins it and captures the Triple Crown, which is against the odds,
nice, but his greatness will always be questioned. No epic rivalries, no
Saratoga, no Breeders' Cup." he writes.
I am not in the slightest convinced that if American Pharoah wins the Triple Crown he will be shut down with a mysterious ailment. Curlin raced for a year worth much more than American Pharoah apparently sold for, California Chrome is happily plying his trade and he was worth a lot of money, and on and on.
If most who are predicting this are correct and they do rush to retire American Pharoah, however, they will have done fans and industry historians a great disservice. But perhaps most of all the horse itself is not being served. American Pharoah looks like a fine horse, a horse that might be great, a horse that comes around very infrequently, a horse who could do great things. "For the good of the horse," let him prove it.
Enjoy your Wednesday everyone.
Sinking marketing money directly into the horseplayer by seeding pools is effective, in both theory and practice In Ontario and elsewher...
One of life's many mysteries on gambling twitter is the Jackpot Bet. Oftentimes people like @shottakingtime, echoed by others, will pos...
Yesterday we wrote about some (many?) inside the business who don't quite understand what we bettors do each day to try and scratch som...
There's something going on in horse racing today , but I have not really followed it. Instead, I've been thinking about two words we...
Innovation and horse racing. Put together, the two of them elicit feverish reaction in this sport. One one side you have the customers, alon...
Unless you are off the twitter grid (God bless you), you've no doubt witnessed the feud of the month(s) between ITP and some public raci...