Friday, October 21, 2016
Racing and "I Don't Know"
Why is it that when you ask a question to someone formulating and implementing racing policy, the answer is more often than not, "I Don't Know".
We need geotargeting.
Why?
People are betting on their ADW accounts at the track.
How much?
I don't know.
Are we losing revenue?
Yes.
How do you know?
I don't know.
If we inconvenience customers for a slightly higher margin, will those playing on ADW's bet the same amount when on track at the windows, or will some stay home and play, hurting attendance?
I don't know.
That's one example. But you can ask the same questions about how much Derby Wars is "hurting" Magna, or how much revenue will be lost or gained from a takeout change. The answer, invariably, is "I don't know".
You'd think with hundreds of billions of dollars of handle over the last 100 years, racing would be able to use data to change policy like a real business: Forecast, model, project, look at the cost-benefits, and then decide.
Instead, it's not like that. It's "I don't know."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
-
Standardbred Canada has a poll up asking who is the greatest trotter who ever lived. These questions are fun, but really it is impossible t...
-
There has been a lot of discussion of late via #simocon about racing, betting and signals and all the rest. The main theme is that racing ca...
-
The news hit the wires today that TVG is in search of a new CEO. This news assures a shake-up in programming at the huge ADW, especially w...
-
How do we differentiate ourselves from thoroughbred bettors? What are the pros and cons of being a harness bettor? In a recent article at R2...
-
A lot of you have seen this Portnoy post about his beat in the Pick 6 at Del Mar yesterday: I made it to last leg of pick 6 at Del Mar. I h...
-
In 1996, most know that the pari-mutuel tax on wagering was reduced from 7.5% to 0.5% as part of the slots at racetracks program. The indust...
-
I saw this tweet by Nick yesterday. Nick is the morning line maker at Keeneland. I promise I’m not being a smart ass. I clearly made a horr...
-
Harness racing is a unique bird when it comes to driving styles and driving colonies. Whereas in Thoroughbred racing, a jock does not race a...
-
Sitting outside, or in the grandstand at Greenwood brings back many memories. Racing was super-popular and we usually had a packed house and...
Similar
Carryovers Provide Big Reach and an Immediate Return
Sinking marketing money directly into the horseplayer by seeding pools is effective, in both theory and practice In Ontario and elsewher...
4 comments:
I thought you told me there were a lot of smart people running the game. Or I did I get it wrong as I usually do?
I still think HANA has a lot of brainpower to influence the game. And customers being satisfied cannot be bad.
Here I disagree, if you are at the tracks, using your ADW account the tracks should earn more than the paltry amount. How much, I don't know.
I do know the Meadwolands and TVG came to an agreement so the Meadowlands earned more on ADW wagers placed on track. TVG didn't have a problem, they agreed the Meadowlands should have earned more.
I am not saying it has to be the full amount the track would normally earn, but it should be more than the 3% horsemen and the track split.
Pacing Guy:
Your comments make sense, but I didn't see that as the big point from PTP. Racing managers make decisions that affect bettors without solid information. When pressed, they lack answers. Why? "I DON'T KNOW."
Isn't that the point of the proposed rule: to require ADW's to collect and report to the tracks data regarding ADW betting at tracks, so that the answer won't be "I don't know."
Post a Comment