Friday, October 21, 2016
Racing and "I Don't Know"
Why is it that when you ask a question to someone formulating and implementing racing policy, the answer is more often than not, "I Don't Know".
We need geotargeting.
Why?
People are betting on their ADW accounts at the track.
How much?
I don't know.
Are we losing revenue?
Yes.
How do you know?
I don't know.
If we inconvenience customers for a slightly higher margin, will those playing on ADW's bet the same amount when on track at the windows, or will some stay home and play, hurting attendance?
I don't know.
That's one example. But you can ask the same questions about how much Derby Wars is "hurting" Magna, or how much revenue will be lost or gained from a takeout change. The answer, invariably, is "I don't know".
You'd think with hundreds of billions of dollars of handle over the last 100 years, racing would be able to use data to change policy like a real business: Forecast, model, project, look at the cost-benefits, and then decide.
Instead, it's not like that. It's "I don't know."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
-
Auckland Reactor is coming to the US from New Zealand and he landed in the barn of the very sharp Kelvin Harrison. I don't think many w...
-
Have you seen the RCI's recent push to change the narrative on drugs and racing? The story they tell is accurate, and has been for some...
-
Back in the early 1990's I got my first real job. I was a pretty much an office gofer for a mining consortium. One day a gentleman cam...
-
Yesterday on twitter there was a conversation about why some people are withholding money from Keeneland this meet. A simple question, with...
-
Elmer Patzer walked up to a betting machine and started popping in tickets to see if he won. All of a sudden, whamo, he cashed for $6.5 mill...
-
Horses opening with 10k to win on them, at smaller venues lately? I have not been playing too seriously the past two days, however I did che...
-
Every time I flip on twitter someone is annoyed that NBC is tape delaying some of the events for prime time television. Columnists have join...
-
Canterbury Park - the small Minnesota track that lowered takeout last year, only to raise it this season - concluded their meet recently. Th...
-
Good morning folks. On Awful Announcing, columnist Matt Zemek tore a hide off ESPN for what he thinks is the dumbing down of tennis cover...
Similar
Carryovers Provide Big Reach and an Immediate Return
Sinking marketing money directly into the horseplayer by seeding pools is effective, in both theory and practice In Ontario and elsewher...
4 comments:
I thought you told me there were a lot of smart people running the game. Or I did I get it wrong as I usually do?
I still think HANA has a lot of brainpower to influence the game. And customers being satisfied cannot be bad.
Here I disagree, if you are at the tracks, using your ADW account the tracks should earn more than the paltry amount. How much, I don't know.
I do know the Meadwolands and TVG came to an agreement so the Meadowlands earned more on ADW wagers placed on track. TVG didn't have a problem, they agreed the Meadowlands should have earned more.
I am not saying it has to be the full amount the track would normally earn, but it should be more than the 3% horsemen and the track split.
Pacing Guy:
Your comments make sense, but I didn't see that as the big point from PTP. Racing managers make decisions that affect bettors without solid information. When pressed, they lack answers. Why? "I DON'T KNOW."
Isn't that the point of the proposed rule: to require ADW's to collect and report to the tracks data regarding ADW betting at tracks, so that the answer won't be "I don't know."
Post a Comment