It was announced today that a federal judge ruled for the Stronach Group and against Derby Wars, citing that the contest site was operating like an OTB or ADW.
"A federal judge has ruled that horse racing tournament website Derby
Wars has been operating as an off-track betting business and is subject
to the federal Interstate Horseracing Act, which requires consent of
racetracks and racing commissions prior to accepting any wagers."
This probably pretty much shuts down the company, as is.
Leaving aside that Derby Wars is probably about as close to an ADW or OTB as a hamburger is to an octopus, this is really, really disturbing. Other sports simply do not act like this. No, most other leagues or games, looking for reach for its core product have looked to partner with tournament games. This is especially true for small, niche leagues, like the CFL:
“This new fantasy offering will give avid CFL fans and sports fans new
to our league an opportunity to deepen their engagement with our game.
It’s an important part of our strategy to serve our existing fan base
better than ever before at the same time we attract new fans, including
the next generation of fans," said Christina Litz, the CFL’s Senior Vice-President of Content and Marketing.
That's called "vision". That's a league not worrying that entity X is earning revenue off team names, or game outcomes, but a league trying to partner with a new game as a gateway to becoming a fan and paying customer (or just as important - a vehicle to keep the existing base engaged).
Racing doesn't think like this, and never has.
In racing, as we've opined here, if the big dogs can take more and more of the national betting product, they'd be happy, no matter what the top line number is. For example, if a group could control $2B of $3B in handle, it's better for them than having $2B of $11B in handle. This is simply another step in that direction.
These rulings serve even more of a purpose however, in this quest for a larger market share of a dwindling market. It's a flashing billboard saying to enterprising companies, or people who might want to create something for horse racing : "Go away"
I doubt this is any way to grow an industry. And since horse racing hasn't been growing, they're doing pretty good job at accomplishing that.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
-
Standardbred Canada has a poll up asking who is the greatest trotter who ever lived. These questions are fun, but really it is impossible t...
-
There has been a lot of discussion of late via #simocon about racing, betting and signals and all the rest. The main theme is that racing ca...
-
The news hit the wires today that TVG is in search of a new CEO. This news assures a shake-up in programming at the huge ADW, especially w...
-
How do we differentiate ourselves from thoroughbred bettors? What are the pros and cons of being a harness bettor? In a recent article at R2...
-
A lot of you have seen this Portnoy post about his beat in the Pick 6 at Del Mar yesterday: I made it to last leg of pick 6 at Del Mar. I h...
-
In 1996, most know that the pari-mutuel tax on wagering was reduced from 7.5% to 0.5% as part of the slots at racetracks program. The indust...
-
I saw this tweet by Nick yesterday. Nick is the morning line maker at Keeneland. I promise I’m not being a smart ass. I clearly made a horr...
-
Harness racing is a unique bird when it comes to driving styles and driving colonies. Whereas in Thoroughbred racing, a jock does not race a...
-
Sitting outside, or in the grandstand at Greenwood brings back many memories. Racing was super-popular and we usually had a packed house and...
Similar
Carryovers Provide Big Reach and an Immediate Return
Sinking marketing money directly into the horseplayer by seeding pools is effective, in both theory and practice In Ontario and elsewher...
No comments:
Post a Comment