It was announced today that a federal judge ruled for the Stronach Group and against Derby Wars, citing that the contest site was operating like an OTB or ADW.
"A federal judge has ruled that horse racing tournament website Derby
Wars has been operating as an off-track betting business and is subject
to the federal Interstate Horseracing Act, which requires consent of
racetracks and racing commissions prior to accepting any wagers."
This probably pretty much shuts down the company, as is.
Leaving aside that Derby Wars is probably about as close to an ADW or OTB as a hamburger is to an octopus, this is really, really disturbing. Other sports simply do not act like this. No, most other leagues or games, looking for reach for its core product have looked to partner with tournament games. This is especially true for small, niche leagues, like the CFL:
“This new fantasy offering will give avid CFL fans and sports fans new
to our league an opportunity to deepen their engagement with our game.
It’s an important part of our strategy to serve our existing fan base
better than ever before at the same time we attract new fans, including
the next generation of fans," said Christina Litz, the CFL’s Senior Vice-President of Content and Marketing.
That's called "vision". That's a league not worrying that entity X is earning revenue off team names, or game outcomes, but a league trying to partner with a new game as a gateway to becoming a fan and paying customer (or just as important - a vehicle to keep the existing base engaged).
Racing doesn't think like this, and never has.
In racing, as we've opined here, if the big dogs can take more and more of the national betting product, they'd be happy, no matter what the top line number is. For example, if a group could control $2B of $3B in handle, it's better for them than having $2B of $11B in handle. This is simply another step in that direction.
These rulings serve even more of a purpose however, in this quest for a larger market share of a dwindling market. It's a flashing billboard saying to enterprising companies, or people who might want to create something for horse racing : "Go away"
I doubt this is any way to grow an industry. And since horse racing hasn't been growing, they're doing pretty good job at accomplishing that.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
-
Auckland Reactor is coming to the US from New Zealand and he landed in the barn of the very sharp Kelvin Harrison. I don't think many w...
-
Have you seen the RCI's recent push to change the narrative on drugs and racing? The story they tell is accurate, and has been for some...
-
Back in the early 1990's I got my first real job. I was a pretty much an office gofer for a mining consortium. One day a gentleman cam...
-
Yesterday on twitter there was a conversation about why some people are withholding money from Keeneland this meet. A simple question, with...
-
Elmer Patzer walked up to a betting machine and started popping in tickets to see if he won. All of a sudden, whamo, he cashed for $6.5 mill...
-
Every time I flip on twitter someone is annoyed that NBC is tape delaying some of the events for prime time television. Columnists have join...
-
Horses opening with 10k to win on them, at smaller venues lately? I have not been playing too seriously the past two days, however I did che...
-
Canterbury Park - the small Minnesota track that lowered takeout last year, only to raise it this season - concluded their meet recently. Th...
-
Good morning folks. On Awful Announcing, columnist Matt Zemek tore a hide off ESPN for what he thinks is the dumbing down of tennis cover...
Similar
Carryovers Provide Big Reach and an Immediate Return
Sinking marketing money directly into the horseplayer by seeding pools is effective, in both theory and practice In Ontario and elsewher...
No comments:
Post a Comment