Sometimes some tweet storms are really interesting. This morning:
You can do a lot stringing 140 characters.
Horse racing - unlike anything really - rewards, and condones 'putting one over on people'. Unloading a claimer with a bum knee, with few starts left, is considered good business. Even the aggrieved party accepts it as part of the game, with the vernacular "he unloaded that rat on me." It's like some sort of strange badge of honor. This doesn't happen all the time, of course. I remember selling a horse once and watching the trainer explain how the filly's stifles were bothering her, that her ulcer issues needed taking care of, etc. To him, and others, that - not unloading one - is good business.
But as a rule, horse racing has always been the old west, and putting one over on someone is not frowned upon. It's accepted and it's part of the culture.
I really don't see that changing, unless there's a massive shift in the way horse racing does business. If you sell a house with a leaky basement you knew about, the deal can be rescinded, and in some cases the seller can be charged with fraud. This, through home inspections and the law, ensures a proper and fluid housing market. Horse racing in Hong Kong does the job, with vet reports, but the differences between Hong Kong and North America are as wide as the day is long. Claiming a horse will continue to be like a bizarre Christmas present that is not unwrapped until the scans and bloods come back a few days after you claim him.
And I have not even touched on the bettors. Betting is buyer beware in the utmost of extremes.
Sometimes I wonder if society even cares about this stuff in sports. They are desensitized that people cheat. Well, some sports. In golf if you doctored a ball's compression by even a small amount and it was uncovered, you would be banned for life and no one would come to your defense. If you doctor a football the same way, it's a reason for a court case, with minions at your beck and call in the media to protect and apologize for you. "It was kinda cheating, but everyone cheats. And we don't 100% know he knew, you know?" Two sports, two different cultures.
Without central control, a central office to set standards across the sport - aka things that will never happen - horse racing will continue to be buyer beware, continue to be a business shrouded in secrecy. It was like that in 1930, and it will be that way in 2030. It is what it is.
Enjoy your day everyone.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
-
There has been a lot of discussion of late via #simocon about racing, betting and signals and all the rest. The main theme is that racing ca...
-
Standardbred Canada has a poll up asking who is the greatest trotter who ever lived. These questions are fun, but really it is impossible t...
-
The news hit the wires today that TVG is in search of a new CEO. This news assures a shake-up in programming at the huge ADW, especially w...
-
How do we differentiate ourselves from thoroughbred bettors? What are the pros and cons of being a harness bettor? In a recent article at R2...
-
A lot of you have seen this Portnoy post about his beat in the Pick 6 at Del Mar yesterday: I made it to last leg of pick 6 at Del Mar. I h...
-
In 1996, most know that the pari-mutuel tax on wagering was reduced from 7.5% to 0.5% as part of the slots at racetracks program. The indust...
-
I saw this tweet by Nick yesterday. Nick is the morning line maker at Keeneland. I promise I’m not being a smart ass. I clearly made a horr...
-
Harness racing is a unique bird when it comes to driving styles and driving colonies. Whereas in Thoroughbred racing, a jock does not race a...
-
Sitting outside, or in the grandstand at Greenwood brings back many memories. Racing was super-popular and we usually had a packed house and...
Similar
Carryovers Provide Big Reach and an Immediate Return
Sinking marketing money directly into the horseplayer by seeding pools is effective, in both theory and practice In Ontario and elsewher...
No comments:
Post a Comment