When you have something big like a Super Bowl (or as my legal team at PTP calls it "The Big Game") it attracts many observers: The casuals, the experts, the every day football watchers, the fantasy players, the drinkers, the partiers, and the folks who need something to watch after Puppy Bowl.
What many of those observers do, is bet.
Yesterday, Nevada took in $119 million on the big game, a record. In 1991, when (sorry Gene-o) Scott Norwood's kick went wide right, $40 million was bet. That's almost a triple in 20 years.
Overall, in a given year, Nevada takes in $3.62 billion in bets, with a rake of 5.6%.
This year the books made out like bandits. I read the numbers geeks, and the numbers geeks loved Seattle. They were coming in 100% healthy, they shut down all-world offenses like New Orleans, not once but twice, and they had a serviceable running game. The crowd (full disclosure, I did not bet the game, but thought the Broncos would win, so I'm the crowd I guess) loves the flash of a good offensive teams with big names. Their money flooded the Broncos.
If you were a cold hard numbers geek, there was value. You could make that punt with some verve.
Horse racing does not have that dumb money quotient too often anymore. There's enough smart money to hammer an underbet down, allowing the odds board to settle at somewhere near fair, with rebate.
"Dumb" money allows for a 16.5% book hold that happened yesterday and that's pretty amazing.
It's fascinating that one game can generate so much volume. If you are saying "Pocket, that's $119 million..... horse racing does a lot more than that" you would be right, but you are fishing in the wrong pond. With illegal betting, magic squares and a hundred other Super Bowl betting avenues, legal Las Vegas betting volume is said to be 1% of the nationwide total. The game did more like $12 billion yesterday, or more than is bet on 46,000 races last year in horse racing.
You'll often see other jurisdictions like Hong Kong worry constantly about pool size and adding new bets. The hope is to keep racing popular enough where there is a big enough dumb money quotient to make it attractive. Just like the Super Bowl.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
-
Standardbred Canada has a poll up asking who is the greatest trotter who ever lived. These questions are fun, but really it is impossible t...
-
There has been a lot of discussion of late via #simocon about racing, betting and signals and all the rest. The main theme is that racing ca...
-
The news hit the wires today that TVG is in search of a new CEO. This news assures a shake-up in programming at the huge ADW, especially w...
-
How do we differentiate ourselves from thoroughbred bettors? What are the pros and cons of being a harness bettor? In a recent article at R2...
-
A lot of you have seen this Portnoy post about his beat in the Pick 6 at Del Mar yesterday: I made it to last leg of pick 6 at Del Mar. I h...
-
In 1996, most know that the pari-mutuel tax on wagering was reduced from 7.5% to 0.5% as part of the slots at racetracks program. The indust...
-
I saw this tweet by Nick yesterday. Nick is the morning line maker at Keeneland. I promise I’m not being a smart ass. I clearly made a horr...
-
Harness racing is a unique bird when it comes to driving styles and driving colonies. Whereas in Thoroughbred racing, a jock does not race a...
-
Sitting outside, or in the grandstand at Greenwood brings back many memories. Racing was super-popular and we usually had a packed house and...
Similar
Carryovers Provide Big Reach and an Immediate Return
Sinking marketing money directly into the horseplayer by seeding pools is effective, in both theory and practice In Ontario and elsewher...
No comments:
Post a Comment