In racing one of the biggest debates is about racedates. Horse owners or trainers (like I am sometime) want a lot of them. Please dial me up a five horse field where we all get some dough! Oh, and make the purse high too, ok?
Bettors on the other hand like short fields about as much as gastro-intestinal surgery.
Who is right, who is wrong? I guess that depends on your perspective. In the case of handle as a metric, deeper fields, less races and more contentious affairs win that battle ten out of ten times.
In thoroughbred racing, Delaware Park concluded their meet with something wacky - a rise in handles.
Delaware Park raced 27 fewer days this year but registered increases in total handle and average daily handle, track officials said Oct. 28. Track officials and horsemen agreed to cut the final seven days of the meet to conserve purse money. This year’s meet originally was scheduled to end Nov. 7.
Larger field size, a positively correlated metric to handle (add one horse a race and handle goes up by 5%), is the main reason why they say.
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
-
There has been a lot of discussion of late via #simocon about racing, betting and signals and all the rest. The main theme is that racing ca...
-
Standardbred Canada has a poll up asking who is the greatest trotter who ever lived. These questions are fun, but really it is impossible t...
-
The news hit the wires today that TVG is in search of a new CEO. This news assures a shake-up in programming at the huge ADW, especially w... -
How do we differentiate ourselves from thoroughbred bettors? What are the pros and cons of being a harness bettor? In a recent article at R2...
-
A lot of you have seen this Portnoy post about his beat in the Pick 6 at Del Mar yesterday: I made it to last leg of pick 6 at Del Mar. I h...
-
In 1996, most know that the pari-mutuel tax on wagering was reduced from 7.5% to 0.5% as part of the slots at racetracks program. The indust...
-
I saw this tweet by Nick yesterday. Nick is the morning line maker at Keeneland. I promise I’m not being a smart ass. I clearly made a horr...
-
Harness racing is a unique bird when it comes to driving styles and driving colonies. Whereas in Thoroughbred racing, a jock does not race a...
-
Sitting outside, or in the grandstand at Greenwood brings back many memories. Racing was super-popular and we usually had a packed house and...
4 comments:
Lots of cheap racing at Del Park this year but decent size fields across the board. It's a no brainer -- bigger fields increases handle no matter what the class of horses.
Rocket science it ain't. Race every day with small fields and nobody cares. Give bettors a breather and see better contests, and maybe even some better horses slightly more often, people will show their support with cash.
Flash poll via Paceadvantage.com:
Which would you rather play.....
High quality horses in races with short fields : 9.6%
Low quality horses in races with full fields: 90.4%
Yet the industry (see Southern California racing) clings to the welfare model of 5 or 6 horses and money for everyone. It would be ok if that is what they want to do.... just don't complain when your handle gets torched.
Peter B
Maybe the only way to motivate racing to improve their product and increase handle is to tie the slots money to the handle. Keep your handle up and you get all the slots money. If the handle drops then some of the slots money reverts to the government.
RG
Post a Comment