I was on twitter last night for the start of the "NFL Kickoff". The Cowboys were playing the Giants, and whipping boy Tony Romo was already trending on twitter after the first series, with the words "Damn Romo" reaching number three. Amazingly, this morning (after the Cowboys won) Romo is still trending.
Art Modell, long time owner of the Browns (and Ravens of course) passed away at age 87 yesterday. He never knew what twitter was for many of those years, but he's one of the reasons a quarterback could trend on it for 15 straight hours.
In the 1960's the National Football League had some issues and it was mainly based on
television. Pete Rozelle, the commissioner, had to convince the owners
that television was the way of the future and that the only way the
sport could grow was to work out a collective plan to exploit it for the
leagues gain. The team owners were up in arms because at that time live gate was
the major revenue driver for football. Owners - especially those in smaller cities - did not want to embrace this new medium in fear of losing their fan base.
Rozelle convinced these businessmen that the status-quo was not an
option. The NFL was the first league to embrace television, creating NFL
films, the Super Bowl and much more.
Fast forward several years.
As television got bigger and bigger and the league and teams were
making more and more money, there were the inevitable problems. Up popped
revenue sharing. Rozelle had to convince 30 or so folks that sharing TV
revenue would be good for everyone, and a boon for the league.
It worked. Multi-billion dollar TV deals have made the NFL the most successful sport in the western world. The power structure and revenue share allow small market teams like Green Bay to compete with the Giants on all levels.
In the words of Art Modell, Rozelle got "a bunch of fat cat republicans to become socialists".
let's think about this: How did a league worth millions upon millions
with owners who possessed the ego the size of the federal deficit agree on something
so large and fundamental to do what is right for everyone, not just a few? The easy answer is that they had a commissioner, but that's probably too easy. Each of those twenty five or so owners had to take a leap of faith, and being businessmen they're used to doing it. Leap they did.
rewind to 1960, but apply our current structure in racing to it. Not only is there 25 or 30
owners of the AFL/NFL teams sitting around the table, but let's say each team has
a player group associated with it. The players all have a seat and
there is not one, but one for each team. As well, let's say they control
50% of all the revenues.
You probably have 100 people sitting around a table, all wanting to speak, with lawyers in tow, ready to fight. Would they have been able to get together to do what is right? Probably not. After an hour of it, Rozelle would probably
quit and send in an application to work for the NBA.
players are signing ten million dollar contracts due to the forward
thinking that went on in the 1960's. Without that forward thinking they
would probably be making a million a year, if they were lucky. NFL teams are now worth a billion bucks or more.
All with a little forward thinking, a structure that rewarded working together with vision, and strong leadership.
With billions of slot money hanging around in some states you'd think working towards some sort of vision and common good would be palatable. With the opportunities of having a near monopoly on internet wagering, you'd think we'd try to make it as easy as possible. With betting exchanges, new fractional bets, world wide common pooling, you'd think we'd move heaven and earth to get it done. But as we've seen for so long in racing, it's easier to fight and protect slices, rather than grow them.
Related: Modell Was Known For More Than the Move
Sinking marketing money directly into the horseplayer by seeding pools is effective, in both theory and practice In Ontario and elsewher...
One of life's many mysteries on gambling twitter is the Jackpot Bet. Oftentimes people like @shottakingtime, echoed by others, will pos...
Yesterday we wrote about some (many?) inside the business who don't quite understand what we bettors do each day to try and scratch som...
Innovation and horse racing. Put together, the two of them elicit feverish reaction in this sport. One one side you have the customers, alon...
Unless you are off the twitter grid (God bless you), you've no doubt witnessed the feud of the month(s) between ITP and some public raci...
There's something going on in horse racing today , but I have not really followed it. Instead, I've been thinking about two words we...