Steve Crist wrote about Derby Futures the other day and a lot of what he offers - deeper fields, lower takeout etc - are worthy. But, what about going outside the parimutuel pools? With Churchill looking at Exchange wagering, this might not be that far off. That's where, in my opinion, Derby Futures can really take off.
Futures wagers, as we all know, are interesting for fans, because they are
pre-qualified already to play futures. Your average sports fan makes a
trip to Vegas and can bet the winner of the NCAA's, or the Stanley Cup.
It is a part of our culture as sports bettors. And it surely ups viewership of these events.
Right now I commend Churchill with their
Derby pool. They have promoted it and made it something fun. Technically
it should be treated as a loss leader, because it markets your event
Is this good enough? I think in ten years,
this wager will be much different than today, and I think it will help
racing because big events drive casual fans, and giving casual fans more
ways and better ways to participate and share their experiences, is
what we're after.
There are a few problems with the
Future Pool. All horses are not represented, the odds lack a true real
time feel, and you can not change your bets after they are made. This is
something that the "World Sports Exchange" tackled as far back as 1997,
and it changed the market forever.
What can a "Derby Exchange" for betting do? Quite a bit.
it can allow you to trade your position. If you have an eye for horses,
or pedigree, and you find a nice horse off of a bad line, the sky is
the limit. Let's look at the Grand National at Betfair for an example:
There is about $700k traded already in this market and it is a tight one. Let's look at the trading on the current chalk.
could have bet this horse at over 45-1 earlier in the season. You
could be trading the horse out right now at a profit. This ups volume as a rule. If you could bet a horse like this, knowing you could trade him out later, you might bet $20
instead of $2, or $500 instead of $50. There is less risk when you can trade positions and with less risk, you bet more money. The goal each year for many, would be to have a "green book" where you walk into the Derby card knowing you are a winner before the race starts, and after the race is finished.
The second thing
it might do is glue the casual observer to the news. If you owned Uncle Mo a couple of years ago at 10-1 and he was 4-1 a month before the
Derby, would you not be paying attention to what the news is? If you
heard a good work report on a longshot would you not pay attention? With
a huge market and a chance to make some money and have some fun, people
will pay attention. There is a 45 year old mom in Ohio who has a real
time ticker on her iPhone for $AAPL news, because she is wondering if she
should sell her position, or buy another share or two. It is not a stretch to imagine a sports
bettor having real-time Derby news on her iPhone.
The third thing it clearly does is attract a new participant in our sport. Peter Webb
never played a horse race in his life before wanting to "trade" such
positions. There are people writing naked puts, buying corn futures, or
using Black-Scholes like we use Formulator who may be interested.
forget cannibalization, and think growth. If thousands of people are
paying attention and trading positions, think of what Derby Day can do.
If you are that in tune with the horses, you better believe you are
going to take a poke at an ex, super, or pick three.
but not least we have the existing fan base. Twitter and Facebook and Grandstand chatter about "who is going to win" is infectious. If we have more people talking about the Derby betting market, rather than "I put $5 on whomever" it's buzzworthy.
The Grand National will have well over
$15 million bet on it via this trading medium. I think in ten years, if
legal in the US, run by whomever, $15M can be chump change. The Derby,
the social media explosion and the ability to attract tons of new folks
to trade this market is a match made perfectly for horse racing.
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
I continue to be fascinated with both the press and general football fan reaction to the Bill Belichick 4th down decision in Sunday's ga...
Last night's Uncle Bill twitter spaces, where TVG's Fanduel's Mike Joyce joined some raucous horseplayers was, well, kind of in...
I was outside awhile back and noticed some kids playing with the pigskin. They flipped me the ball and I sent one kid on a fly pattern. I ga...
This past weekend's racing proves to me that this game, although, yes, with less public money, with the teams, with the sharps (which no...
This was originally printed in Trot Magazine's Horseplayer Issue. The pick 5 is a racing staple with almost every track trying to take...
Super Spectacular Blog Vol 8 - Preakness Day Thoughts. Rudulph, TVG Actually Doesn't Mention ITP, Go and No Go - Why Sharps Use Board Odds, The Value of Powerful Cards, & You Know You're Ice Cold When You Lose a Mascot RaceWelcome to the 8th edition of the Monday Super Spectacular Blog! It was Preakness week and frankly instead of a horse racing pool, next yea...
Monday's Super Spectacular Blog Vol 4 - Maloney, Twitter Dust Ups, Seconditis, $111k Scores, A Potential Consistent Judging Sighting, Joyce & ITP Visit Frank Stronach, Probabilities & the Best Wager in the NationWelcome to the fourth edition of the Super Spectacular Blog . I truly appreciate those of you who read this each week. Even when I weed out ...
Monday's Super Spectacular Blog - CRW Symptoms of a Business Disease, Pushing 2YO's, Curious Preps, ITP-Joyce Buddy Movie Update & A Guest Appearance from Kiefer SutherlandWelcome again to the Super Spectacular Blog! Thank you, as always, for reading and supporting our many advertisers. And to the Russian bots...
Sinking marketing money directly into the horseplayer by seeding pools is effective, in both theory and practice In Ontario and elsewher...