Prairie Meadows, a racino in Iowa, is being urged to end harness racing, while keeping both quarterhorse and thoroughbred racing.
Prairie Meadows is considering changing to a racing format that completely splits its Thoroughbred and Quarter Horse racing while eliminating harness racing.
I wonder if headlines like this will be a wake up call for us? I have a sneaky feeling it won't.
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
-
Welcome to the 8th edition of the Monday Super Spectacular Blog! It was Preakness week and frankly instead of a horse racing pool, next yea... -
I continue to be fascinated with both the press and general football fan reaction to the Bill Belichick 4th down decision in Sunday's ga...
-
Last week's inaugural Super Spectacular Monday Blog got a lot of hits, and not just from Russian bots (although cпасибо to all Russian r... -
Welcome to the Super Spectacular Blog Vol 5 . Thanks for reading and sharing this disorganized barrage of thoughts and links each week. Ti... -
This past weekend's racing proves to me that this game, although, yes, with less public money, with the teams, with the sharps (which no... -
On the Harness Edge this morning, I see that there is a story up about the BCSA offering their members up for driver and trainer interviews ...
-
Last night's Uncle Bill twitter spaces, where TVG's Fanduel's Mike Joyce joined some raucous horseplayers was, well, kind of in...
-
I was outside awhile back and noticed some kids playing with the pigskin. They flipped me the ball and I sent one kid on a fly pattern. I ga...
4 comments:
They are keeping the $1 million in purse supplements for fair races at least. Prairie Meadows is my home track, and the mixed meet format they has frankly always been a bit of a mess so something had to change.
Harness racing has consistently had lower handle and lower attendance than either the thoroughbred or the mixed quarter horse meets. You also have to consider the cost to scraping the track to prepare it for harness racing (I seem to remember reading this was in the area of $500,000). Combine those factors with the fact that much of the general public here feels like horse racing is a waste of money and should be dropped completely at Prairie Meadows and cutting one of the bigger money losers probably seemed like the obvious choice.
I personally don't have anything against harness racing, but I'm not sure what sort of wake up call there might be here for you. Probably not one harness interests want to hear.
It's just matter of time until we see more of this on a much larger and violent scale.
It might go like this....Casino at racetrack subsidizing racing to the tune of $100 million a year goes to state government and says...racing is dead and just drains all of this money from us...we are both (casino and gov)hurting for cash...why don't we just whack up the $100 million and get rid of this parasite....DONE DEAL
What ITP said is basically what is happening in Iowa. A study came out last year saying that racing is losing money at to the tune of ~$30 million a year, and to say that it created an uproar is putting it mildly. If it was not mandated as part of the casino license that the track have racing it might be more than just harness racing being cut.
ITP is correct. They had an investor conference yesterday regarding the casino industry in Atlantic City and the first thing attacked by analysts is the lunacy of subsidizing racetracks where no one attends. Slot money is a crutch and unless we get people interested in the sport; and that also means in the grandstands, people are going to question why to support racing with slot revenue when it can go to the state.
Post a Comment