In a press release dated today, Woodbine announced that their standardbred product will race 7/8 of a mile, or 7f for you thoroughbred players,each Monday night. It is to begin as an experiment next week.
"This distance is being introduced in an effort to try and improve flow of the races during the second and third quarters," said Bruce Murray, WEG's Vice-President of Standardbred Racing. "Although Woodbine has always been a front-end favouring track, it is readily apparent to customers and horse people that since the Fall Meet opened, it is more prevalent than ever. The drivers we've spoken to are in favour of trying it."
At the 7/8ths mile distance, the start of the race will be moved up the stretch to where the finish line is, creating a shorter distance to the first turn. It is hoped that this will lead to more action throughout the race.
For those that do not watch Woodbine, it is a 7/8's mile track. This means that the finish line is about an 1/8th of mile after the start. What happens with this is the drivers gun out big time at the start. There is a quick sprint to get position and then the turn comes. First quarters of 26 flat happen often. After that tough sprint the leader generally takes a rest, the rest of the horses settle and bam - very few challenges.
I believe there is much more to the lack of second quarter challenges at Woodbine and Balmoral, but so goes the theory.
So they hope that this might encourage some movement.
Of course, to revive harness racing and racing in general, changing something like this is small potatoes. Some tracks have a takeout equal to the Massachusetts State Lottery. They could run bikini clad Maxim girls to run around the track and we would not be able to grow enough to beat that takeout.
Cangamble has a good piece up today, by the way. He has been writing some good stuff of late.
Do these stats mean that people are gambling less? Absolutely not.
Take Canada for instance. $13.6 billion in gambling money was lost last year by Canadians last year. In 1992, only $2.7 billion was lost.
Canadians can and do bet on anything. Internet sports, poker, Pro-line, slots, all sorts of lotteries, oh and horse racing. We didn't have as many options in 1992, but we did have to go the track or the teletheatre to make a bet on a horse race.
In 1992 handle in Canada was $770 million, last year it was only $560 million. Not only is that shocking (I know slots took away a lot of it), but if racing grew at the same rate as total gambling grew in Canada, the handle number last year would have been over $3.5 billion.
In 2004, The Cummings Report was published. It seems that racing execs used the valuable information and recommendations in the 72 page report as toilet paper.
Monday, November 24, 2008
Woodbine Racing 7/8's Dashes
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Most Trafficked, Last 12 Months
It's Metro Night at Mohawk this evening, where over $3M will be handed out to some of the best trotters and pacers around. A few notes...
I was outside awhile back and noticed some kids playing with the pigskin. They flipped me the ball and I sent one kid on a fly pattern. I ga...
This was originally printed in Trot Magazine's Horseplayer Issue. The pick 5 is a racing staple with almost every track trying to take...
I continue to be fascinated with both the press and general football fan reaction to the Bill Belichick 4th down decision in Sunday's ga...
This past weekend's racing proves to me that this game, although, yes, with less public money, with the teams, with the sharps (which no...
So, I did a little reading on the railway rebate system. No, stop laughing, I really did. And it was a pretty interesting exercise. For tho...
Last night's Uncle Bill twitter spaces, where TVG's Fanduel's Mike Joyce joined some raucous horseplayers was, well, kind of in...
For about 130 years of pro football, 4th and two was beset with a flight to safety. Not going for it (the pain of missing a first down) alwa...
Carryovers Provide Big Reach and an Immediate Return
Sinking marketing money directly into the horseplayer by seeding pools is effective, in both theory and practice In Ontario and elsewher...
I've made comments about the lack of action at Woodbine a few times in the past. I commend them for giving it a whirl.
I'm interested in the other reasons you think this happens?
I'm headed to the Big M to catch Somebeach's last hurrah, hopefully Dewey goes also. Any chance Somebeach gets upset?
2 things with less movement at WOX, imo: the stock. Slot tracks in Ontario have big purses. A track like Georgian is high quality. The product at Woodbine gets watered down. There is movement at the M with horses because in a tough claimer 9 out of 10 horses can win. At Woodbine the fields are not deep. And 2) The drivers are less aggressive at times.
I think the stock and the sprint argument is taking hold though as the two main reasons. Evidence? In overnights with a pile of M drivers not much changes at both BLMP and Woodbine and Mohawk. Also, there is not much movement at the M either with a nw trot on a Wednesday. Further there is less movement at the M the past 24 months since the crazy Yonkers track took a pile of horses away from the M. It has gotten more like woodbine as the stock got cheaper.
Beach v Shadow Play? Anything can happen in a horse race I guess, but if the Beach is sharp I think he is 4-6 lengths better than SP. Fair odds might be 2-5 and 5-2 on them respectively, imo.
Enjoy the race!
It is a good idea to run different distances in harness racing. Maybe at the shorter distances the horse with the best undetectable drugs in its system may not get up in time or get in more trouble and lose:)
Leave it to a thoroughbred player to kick us for positives.
Have you bet any Biancone horses lately? :)
7/8 of a mile races!!! How quick can Gem make it back???
Post a Comment