So there is nothing much going on. I frankly can't believe how blah its been lately. So for viewing pleasure, from someone else who thinks it is blah, here is a video from a chat board showing who is who of the Belmont/Aqueduct on air talent. I need this done for Woodbine. I constantly get Blanchard and Hamilton mixed up.
h/t to Bigmack
Similar
Carryovers Provide Big Reach and an Immediate Return
Sinking marketing money directly into the horseplayer by seeding pools is effective, in both theory and practice In Ontario and elsewher...
Popular
-
One of life's many mysteries on gambling twitter is the Jackpot Bet. Oftentimes people like @shottakingtime, echoed by others, will pos...
-
It's Friday - the weekend! - where the tracks are ready to fire-up some serious betting entertainment. As we know, that's primaril...
-
Yesterday we wrote about some (many?) inside the business who don't quite understand what we bettors do each day to try and scratch som...
-
Innovation and horse racing. Put together, the two of them elicit feverish reaction in this sport. One one side you have the customers, alon...
-
The pandemic and resulting discombobulation has certainly thrown things out of whack in horse racing, and some narratives are being turned o...
2 comments:
That's because Blanchard and hamilton (Kirens too) are so vanilla, boring, fence-sitting, non-confontational that you can't tell them apart. Why do I need these "experts" to go on national television and rouinely select 2-5, 3-5, 4-5 or even money shots race after race after race? Blanchard asks the exact same question in EVERY post-race interview which is "What is your horse's best weapons at this point". If you don't believe me watch for yourself.
I like Woodbine's on air talent. I think they do a more than adequate job. Public handicappers (at least one of them) tend to go to chalk so they have a higher hit rate.
Anyhoo, to each their own.
Post a Comment